News - Yemen: The Leader of the revolution, Sayyed Abdulmalik Al-Houthi affirmed that we are witnessing "two parallel paths: one of the Israeli enemy at its highest level of aggression and brutality, and the other within the Arab and Islamic world to discourage the nation from supporting the Palestinian people."

He added that "the negative stance of major Arab regimes toward Iran is because, in their view, Iran commits the 'sin' of supporting the Palestinian people—surpassing them in doing so."

He pointed out that "the direction of major Arab regimes is entirely different—they ensure no one seriously and sincerely stands with the Palestinian cause." He confirmed that "the Israeli path, marked by unprecedented criminality and aggression, seeks through practical steps to liquidate the Palestinian cause once and for all, with American support."

He explained that "the parallel path in the Arab and Islamic reality is one of sedation and paralysis of the nation," noting that "whenever the Israeli enemy escalates its aggression, displacement, and destruction, the nation is further shackled and pushed backward."

He emphasized: "The Israeli enemy kills, destroys, and displaces, yet they lecture our nation about peace—'Don’t move, we embrace peace!'" He clarified that "the enemy openly declares, alongside its actions, that it will never recognize a Palestinian state."

He explained that "the rhetoric of peace, normalization, and entrenching defeat serves the Israeli agenda. The enemy is not interested in peace but in achieving its final goal: the complete liquidation of the Palestinian cause."

He affirmed that "a significant portion of Arab regimes' media campaigns target those who support Palestine—distorting, doubting, and smearing them. Many Arab regimes adopt Israeli and American logic, merely in Arabic."

He noted that "in many Arab countries, any popular activity supporting Palestine is banned. If protests occur, they are suppressed."

He criticized "how some Arab regimes mirror the West in banning criticism of Israel under the pretext of 'anti-Semitism.' Some Arabs seek to criminalize any solidarity with Palestine, making their stance worse than mere inaction—it is active service to the enemy."

He stated: "The logical stance, based on justice and truth, is that the Israeli enemy should not possess any weapons—let alone be armed with the deadliest arsenal."

He pointed out that "in Lebanon, certain political forces with a history of ties to Israel push for disarming Hezbollah," asserting that "Hezbollah’s weapons protect Lebanon’s sovereignty. Disarming it serves the enemies—a stupid, absurd, and malicious logic. Our Islamic nation needs arms more than ever."

He asked: "Why should our nation be disarmed while facing brutal Israeli-American aggression? They attack our faith and existence, then demand we lay down arms to become easy prey?"

Sayyed Abdulmalik urged learning from history: "Those who surrendered arms while targeted by a hateful, criminal enemy faced extermination, humiliation, and slaughter. The Sabra and Shatila massacre happened only after Palestinian fighters disarmed."

He added: "When did the worst massacres in Palestine occur? When Palestinians lacked sufficient arms, early military mobilization, and Arab-Islamic support to acquire weapons."

He affirmed that "Gaza’s steadfastness proves the correct path," noting that "the mass starvation of Gazans reflects not military strength but horrific criminality."

He detailed that "Al-Qassam Brigades executed nearly 15 diverse operations—ambushes, destroying enemy vehicles, and sniping criminals. Al-Quds Brigades also carried out major operations." He praised "the spirit of unity and cooperation among Gaza’s fighters as extraordinary and vital."

He noted that "global recognition of Palestinian rights and Israeli crimes is at an all-time high, exposing Israel, the U.S., and Zionist-aligned European regimes. The world’s mood favors Muslims—if they seize this moment to push back the threat."

He criticized "shamefully weak stances from some Arab/Islamic regimes, failing even in basic solidarity, unlike nations on the other side of the world."

He criticized "religious scholars who openly discourage support for Gaza—the same figures who once incited so-called 'jihad' in Syria and Iraq."