Moreover, the statements made by U.S. President Donald Trump, American officials, and Zionist leaders confirm direct U.S. military involvement in the aggression against Iran, including in intercepting Iranian missiles. This proves that this criminal act of aggression was premeditated between the U.S. and the Zionist regime, and that the entire operation was nothing more than a role-playing scheme aimed at coercing Tehran into submission, stripping it of its key strengths—its peaceful nuclear program and growing missile capabilities.

Israel’s Aggression Against Iran: Strategic Objectives

The Israeli attack on Iran sought to achieve several strategic and security goals, most notably:

Destroying Iran’s Peaceful Nuclear Program

This was the primary objective, as the Zionist regime claims it seeks to prevent Iran from attaining military nuclear capabilities that could threaten its regional dominance. However, this goal has already failed. Hebrew Channel 13 quoted an Israeli official admitting: "We cannot destroy all of Iran’s nuclear infrastructure, and it is clear this will end in a negotiated settlement."

Asserting Regional Dominance

The attack was also an attempt by the Israeli regime to impose itself as the hegemonic power in the region, acting with impunity against Iran and other nations targeted in its expansionist agenda. Yet, as Sayyed Abdulmalik al-Houthi emphasized in his speech on Wilayah Day, the axis of resistance must restore the balance of deterrence—not accept a reality where Israel dictates terms. The enemy’s arrogance quickly turned to regret after failing to counter Iran’s overwhelming retaliatory strike.

Saving Netanyahu’s Political Career

Experts believe the attack was less about Iran’s nuclear program and more about propping up Netanyahu’s collapsing domestic standing. The Washington Post noted: "Netanyahu celebrated the tactical success but had no clear strategic goal beyond boosting his political position." Similarly, The Guardian warned that the escalation could be a ploy to tighten Netanyahu’s grip on power and sabotage U.S.-Iran diplomacy, while The Financial Times highlighted that the attack was linked to Netanyahu’s plummeting popularity and ongoing corruption charges.

The Consequences of Aggression

Political analysts agree that Israel’s criminal aggression marks a dangerous turning point, setting the stage for catastrophic scenarios:

A Direct Threat to Zionist Security

Iran’s devastating response—unprecedented in the enemy’s history—has exposed its vulnerability. Continued Israeli recklessness will only invite harsher Iranian retaliation, pushing the regime closer to collapse.

Expanding Regional Conflict

The attack risks dragging the entire region into a wider war, destabilizing an already volatile Middle East.

Global Economic Shockwaves

The aggression has already triggered market instability, with potential ripple effects on energy supplies and global trade.

Diplomatic Deadlock

Oman’s Foreign Minister announced the cancellation of planned U.S.-Iran talks in Muscat, signaling a freeze in nuclear negotiations.

Exposing Israel’s Military Weakness

The failure of Israel’s four-layer defense systems has been laid bare, humiliatingly revealing the enemy’s strategic frailty to the world.

Conclusion

Israel’s attack was a desperate gamble—one that has backfired spectacularly. Instead of breaking Iran’s resolve, it has strengthened the axis of resistance, exposed the limits of U.S.-Zionist power, and set the stage for a new era of Iranian deterrence. The message is clear: Tehran will not bow to coercion, and any further aggression will be met with crushing force.

Translated by Almasirah English website